beach: be pleasant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.63
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, area
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beach towel
Weight: 0.71
, sea shell
Weight: 0.63
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.54
, volcano
Weight: 0.53
, snorkel
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pleasant 1.00
be nice 0.79
be beautiful 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(national park, be beautiful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beach, be pleasant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(national park, be beautiful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(national park, be beautiful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sea shell, be beautiful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(national park, be beautiful)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(beach, be pleasant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(sea shell, be beautiful)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sea shell, be beautiful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(beach, be pleasant)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(beach, be nice)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(beach, be nice)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(beach, be nice)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(beach, be nice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beach, be pleasant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beach, be pleasant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national park, be beautiful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sea shell, be beautiful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(beach, be pleasant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national park, be beautiful)