beach: has sand

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.63
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, area
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beach towel
Weight: 0.71
, sea shell
Weight: 0.63
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.54
, volcano
Weight: 0.53
, snorkel
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
has sand 1.00
has lot of sand 0.94
has sand and rock 0.93
be cover in sand 0.92
be cover with sand 0.91
be compose of sand 0.84
be sandy 0.79
be at on beach 0.75
be at beach 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at beach)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sea shell, be at on beach)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(beach towel, be at beach)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(sea shell, be at on beach)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(sea shell, be at on beach)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at beach)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at beach)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(beach towel, be at beach)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(beach towel, be at beach)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(beach, has sand)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beach, has sand and rock)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(beach, has sand and rock)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(beach, be cover with sand)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(beach, be cover with sand)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(beach, be cover in sand)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(beach, has sand and rock)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(beach, be cover in sand)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(beach, has lot of sand)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(beach, has lot of sand)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(beach, be cover with sand)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(beach, be cover with sand)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(beach, be cover in sand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(beach, be cover with sand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(beach, be cover with sand)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(beach, be compose of sand)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(beach, has lot of sand)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(beach, be compose of sand)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(beach, be sandy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(beach, has lot of sand)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beach, be sandy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(beach, be cover in sand)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(beach, has sand and rock)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(beach, be cover with sand)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(beach, be cover with sand)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beach, be compose of sand)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(beach, be sandy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(beach, be sandy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beach, be compose of sand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(beach, has sand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(beach, has sand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(beach towel, be at beach)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sea shell, be at on beach)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(beach, has sand)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at beach)