beach: important to british people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.63
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, area
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beach towel
Weight: 0.71
, swimming pool
Weight: 0.66
, sea shell
Weight: 0.63
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.54
, playa
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
important to british people 1.00
were important to people of sahara 0.79
be australian 0.78
were like present day arizona ignored by mexican authorities after mexican independence 0.77
were like day arizona ignored by mexican authorities after mexican independence 0.77
be referred as latin america 0.77
is uk 0.76
were like day arizona ignored after mexican independence 0.76
were like present day arizona ignored after mexican independence 0.76
important to people 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(area, were like present day arizona ignored by mexican authorities after mexican independence)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beach, important to british people)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(area, be referred as latin america)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beach, important to british people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(area, be referred as latin america)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(area, were like present day arizona ignored by mexican authorities after mexican independence)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(area, were like present day arizona ignored by mexican authorities after mexican independence)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(area, be referred as latin america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(playa, were important to people of sahara)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(area, were like present day arizona ignored by mexican authorities after mexican independence)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beach, important to british people)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(area, be referred as latin america)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beach, important to british people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(playa, were important to people of sahara)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(playa, were important to people of sahara)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(beach, important to british people)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(beach, be australian)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(beach, be australian)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(beach, important to people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(beach, be australian)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(beach, important to people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(beach, important to people)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(beach, be australian)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beach, important to people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(beach, important to british people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beach, important to british people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(area, be referred as latin america)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(area, were like present day arizona ignored by mexican authorities after mexican independence)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(playa, were important to people of sahara)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(area, be referred as latin america)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beach, important to british people)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(area, were like present day arizona ignored by mexican authorities after mexican independence)