beach: is popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.63
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, area
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beach towel
Weight: 0.71
, swimming pool
Weight: 0.66
, sea shell
Weight: 0.63
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.54
, playa
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular 1.00
was popular in 1970 0.94
be popular in summer 0.84
is famous 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beach, is popular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national park, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beach, is popular)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(habitat, was popular in 1970) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beach, is popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(national park, is popular)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(habitat, was popular in 1970)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(national park, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(habitat, was popular in 1970)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(national park, is popular)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(national park, is famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beach, is popular)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national park, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beach, is popular)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(habitat, was popular in 1970) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beach, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(beach, is popular)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(beach, be popular in summer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(beach, be popular in summer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(beach, be popular in summer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beach, be popular in summer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beach, is popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beach, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, was popular in 1970)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(national park, is popular)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(national park, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(national park, is popular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, was popular in 1970)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beach, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(national park, is famous)