beacon: be ever useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.60
, technology
Weight: 0.60
, signal
Weight: 0.57
, guide
Weight: 0.53
Siblings compass
Weight: 0.33
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.33
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, electronic device
Weight: 0.32
, turn signal
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be ever useful 1.00
be useful 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(beacon, be ever useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(compass, be useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(beacon, be ever useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(compass, be useful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(compass, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(beacon, be ever useful)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(beacon, be useful)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(beacon, be useful)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(beacon, be useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(beacon, be useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beacon, be ever useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(beacon, be ever useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(compass, be useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(beacon, be ever useful)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)