beagle: has state pet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.83
, breed
Weight: 0.63
, hound
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, hound dog
Weight: 0.52
Siblings cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.42
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.42
, dachshund
Weight: 0.41
, small dog
Weight: 0.41
, poodle
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pet 1.00
is good pet 0.94
has state pets 0.91
is good pets 0.83
make pets 0.83
make good pets 0.81
be popular breed of dog 0.80
is dogs 0.79
is good dogs 0.77
is hunting dogs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make pets)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make good pets)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(poodle, make good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(poodle, make pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is hunting dogs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dachshund, has state pets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(poodle, make pets)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(poodle, make pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is good pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(poodle, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(poodle, make good pets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is hunting dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(beagle, has state pet)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(beagle, is good pet)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pet)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(beagle, has state pets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(beagle, make pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(beagle, is good pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(beagle, make pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(beagle, make good pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(beagle, make pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, make good pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beagle, is dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(beagle, be popular breed of dog)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(beagle, be popular breed of dog)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(beagle, is dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beagle, is dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(beagle, make good pets)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(beagle, be popular breed of dog)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(beagle, is good dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, is good dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(beagle, is hunting dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(beagle, is hunting dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(beagle, is hunting dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(beagle, make good pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beagle, make pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(beagle, be popular breed of dog)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is hunting dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(poodle, make pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is hunting dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dachshund, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(poodle, make good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dachshund, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is good dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)