beagle: is good pet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.83
, breed
Weight: 0.63
, hound
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, hound dog
Weight: 0.52
Siblings cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.42
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.42
, dachshund
Weight: 0.41
, small dog
Weight: 0.41
, poodle
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good pet 1.00
has state pet 0.94
is good pets 0.91
make good pets 0.89
make pets 0.86
has state pets 0.85
is good dogs 0.85
be popular breed of dog 0.82
is dogs 0.81
is good hunting dogs 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make good pets)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make pets)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(poodle, make good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good hunting dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(poodle, make pets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is good pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(poodle, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(poodle, make good pets)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(poodle, make pets)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(poodle, make pets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dachshund, has state pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is good hunting dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(beagle, is good pet)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(beagle, has state pet)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pet)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(beagle, is good pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(beagle, make good pets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, make good pets)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(beagle, make pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(beagle, make pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(beagle, has state pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(beagle, make good pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(beagle, is good dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, is good dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(beagle, make pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beagle, is dogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(beagle, be popular breed of dog)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(beagle, is dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beagle, is dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(beagle, be popular breed of dog)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(beagle, is good hunting dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, is good hunting dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(beagle, be popular breed of dog)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good hunting dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(beagle, make good pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beagle, make pets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(beagle, be popular breed of dog)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good hunting dogs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(poodle, make pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(poodle, make good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dachshund, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dachshund, has state pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is good hunting dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)