beak: be different from humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.44
, animal
Weight: 0.43
, characteristic
Weight: 0.43
, structure
Weight: 0.43
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.31
, tail
Weight: 0.31
, tree frog
Weight: 0.31
, cassowary
Weight: 0.31
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from humans 1.00
is different 0.80
be similar to human mouths 0.79
be in different parts of animal kingdom 0.78
have different shapes 0.77
be in different parts 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(beak, be different from humans)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(beak, have different shapes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(beak, have different shapes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(beak, be similar to human mouths)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(beak, have different shapes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(beak, be similar to human mouths)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(beak, have different shapes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beak, be in different parts of animal kingdom)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(beak, is different)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(beak, be similar to human mouths)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(beak, be in different parts)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(beak, is different)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(beak, be in different parts of animal kingdom)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(beak, is different)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(beak, be similar to human mouths)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(beak, is different)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(beak, be in different parts)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(beak, be in different parts of animal kingdom)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(beak, be in different parts)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(beak, be in different parts of animal kingdom)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beak, be in different parts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(beak, be different from humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beak, be different from humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beak, be different from humans)