beak: differ in size

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.44
, animal
Weight: 0.43
, characteristic
Weight: 0.43
, structure
Weight: 0.43
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.31
, tail
Weight: 0.31
, tree frog
Weight: 0.31
, cassowary
Weight: 0.31
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ in size 1.00
differ in shape 0.90
has size large 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(beak, differ in size)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(beak, differ in size)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(beak, differ in size)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beak, differ in shape)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(beak, differ in size)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beak, has size large)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(beak, differ in size)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(beak, differ in shape)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(beak, differ in size)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(beak, differ in shape)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(beak, differ in size)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(beak, differ in shape)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(beak, differ in size)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(beak, has size large)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(beak, differ in size)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(beak, has size large)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(beak, differ in size)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(beak, has size large)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(beak, differ in size)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(beak, differ in size)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(beak, differ in size)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(beak, differ in size)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(beak, differ in size)