bear: be at arctic

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.66
, carnivore
Weight: 0.64
Siblings black bear
Weight: 0.86
, polar bear
Weight: 0.79
, giant panda
Weight: 0.60
, panda
Weight: 0.59
, big dipper
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at arctic 1.00
be at in arctic 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be at in arctic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bear, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(polar bear, be at in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(polar bear, be at in arctic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bear, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(bear, be at arctic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bear, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(bear, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at arctic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bear, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(bear, be at arctic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(polar bear, be at in arctic)