bear: has physical part eyes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.66
, carnivore
Weight: 0.64
Siblings black bear
Weight: 0.86
, polar bear
Weight: 0.79
, giant panda
Weight: 0.60
, panda
Weight: 0.59
, koala
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part eyes 1.00
has physical part ears 0.89
has physical part nose 0.86
has physical part teeth 0.85
has physical part legs 0.85
has physical part skin 0.84
has physical part hair 0.84
has physical part body 0.84
has physical part noses 0.84
has physical part toes 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part eyes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part eyes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part eyes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part nose)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part eyes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part nose)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, has physical part skin)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panda, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panda, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(panda, has physical part eyes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(polar bear, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(polar bear, has physical part skin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(bear, has physical part eyes)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part ears)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(bear, has physical part ears)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(bear, has physical part ears)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part ears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part eyes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part ears)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part nose)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(polar bear, has physical part skin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(panda, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part eyes)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part ears)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(bear, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part nose)