bear: is big

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.68
, carnivore
Weight: 0.64
Siblings black bear
Weight: 0.86
, polar bear
Weight: 0.79
, giant panda
Weight: 0.60
, panda
Weight: 0.59
, koala
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
is big 1.00
have big feet 0.79
has size large 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have big feet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, is big)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is big)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, has size large)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(giant panda, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is big)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(polar bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(polar bear, is big)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(polar bear, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have big feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(polar bear, has size large) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(polar bear, has size large)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(bear, is big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bear, is big)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bear, is big)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(giant panda, is big)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(polar bear, have big feet)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(polar bear, has size large)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(polar bear, is big)