:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, go to zoo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is zoo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(panda, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(panda, is zoo)
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(bear, is zoo)
Similarity expansion
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bear, go to zoo)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bear, go to zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bear, go to zoo)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bear, go to zoo)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bear, is zoo)
Typical implies Plausible
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bear, is zoo)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(polar bear, go to zoo)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(polar bear, is zoo)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(giant panda, is zoo)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bear, is zoo)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(panda, is zoo)