bear: shit in wood

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.66
, carnivore
Weight: 0.64
Siblings black bear
Weight: 0.86
, polar bear
Weight: 0.79
, giant panda
Weight: 0.60
, panda
Weight: 0.59
, big dipper
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
shit in wood 1.00
shit 0.91
not shit in toilet 0.85
be at wood 0.84
piss on couch 0.77
wants to eat bamboo shoot 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(creature, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bear, shit in wood)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(wild animal, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bear, shit in wood)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at wood)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(creature, be at wood)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at wood)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at wood)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(panda, wants to eat bamboo shoot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(creature, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(bear, shit in wood)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(wild animal, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(bear, shit in wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(panda, wants to eat bamboo shoot)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(panda, wants to eat bamboo shoot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(bear, shit in wood)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bear, be at wood)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bear, be at wood)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bear, be at wood)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(bear, be at wood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bear, shit in wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bear, shit in wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at wood)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(creature, be at wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(panda, wants to eat bamboo shoot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at wood)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bear, shit in wood)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(creature, be at wood)