beard: be seen as unprofessional

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, hair
Weight: 0.55
, man
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.53
, time
Weight: 0.52
Siblings pubic hair
Weight: 0.35
, hair color
Weight: 0.34
, long hair
Weight: 0.34
, wig
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be seen as unprofessional 1.00
be considered unprofessional 0.96
is unprofessional 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(long hair, is unprofessional)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be considered unprofessional)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(long hair, is unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(long hair, is unprofessional)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(beard, be seen as unprofessional)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(beard, be considered unprofessional)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beard, be considered unprofessional)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(beard, be considered unprofessional)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(beard, be considered unprofessional)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(beard, be seen as unprofessional)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(beard, be seen as unprofessional)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(long hair, is unprofessional)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(beard, be seen as unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(long hair, be considered unprofessional)