beard: is more attractive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, hair
Weight: 0.55
, man
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.53
, time
Weight: 0.52
Siblings pubic hair
Weight: 0.35
, hair color
Weight: 0.34
, long hair
Weight: 0.34
, wig
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more attractive 1.00
is attractive 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hair, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(beard, is more attractive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(hair, is attractive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hair, is attractive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(long hair, is attractive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hair, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(beard, is more attractive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(long hair, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(long hair, is attractive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(beard, is more attractive)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(beard, is attractive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(beard, is attractive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(beard, is attractive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(beard, is attractive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(beard, is more attractive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(beard, is more attractive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hair, is attractive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(long hair, is attractive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(beard, is more attractive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hair, is attractive)