beauty: be different than beauty in nature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fairy tale
Weight: 0.65
, quality
Weight: 0.63
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hair salon
Weight: 0.68
, glory
Weight: 0.65
, grace kelly
Weight: 0.64
, waterfall
Weight: 0.59
, samantha
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different than beauty in nature 1.00
be different from beauty of nature 0.99
be different from beauty 0.94
be more important than beauty 0.93
be in art in different from beauty 0.91
is real beauty 0.90
be more important than male beauty 0.89
has quality beauty 0.88
be in nature 0.88
be in man-made art different from nature 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(beauty, be in man-made art different from nature)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(beauty, be in man-made art different from nature)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beauty, be in nature)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beauty, be in man-made art different from nature)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beauty, be different from beauty of nature)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(beauty, be different from beauty of nature)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(beauty, be in art in different from beauty)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(beauty, be in man-made art different from nature)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(beauty, be in nature)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(beauty, be different from beauty of nature)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(beauty, be in art in different from beauty)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beauty, be different from beauty of nature)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(beauty, be in art in different from beauty)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is real beauty)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(beauty, be in nature)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(beauty, be more important than male beauty)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(beauty, be in nature)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(beauty, be in art in different from beauty)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(beauty, be more important than male beauty)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(beauty, is real beauty)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beauty, be more important than male beauty)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(beauty, be more important than male beauty)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(beauty, is real beauty)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beauty, is real beauty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)