beauty: be in nature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fairy tale
Weight: 0.65
, quality
Weight: 0.63
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hair salon
Weight: 0.68
, glory
Weight: 0.65
, grace kelly
Weight: 0.64
, waterfall
Weight: 0.59
, samantha
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in nature 1.00
be different than beauty in nature 0.88
be different from beauty of nature 0.88
be in man-made art different from nature 0.87
be in art different from nature 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(beauty, be in nature)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(beauty, be in man-made art different from nature)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beauty, be in man-made art different from nature)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(beauty, be in man-made art different from nature)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(beauty, be in man-made art different from nature)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beauty, be different from beauty of nature)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(beauty, be different from beauty of nature)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(beauty, be different from beauty of nature)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beauty, be different from beauty of nature)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beauty, be different than beauty in nature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(beauty, be in nature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beauty, be in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beauty, be in nature)