beauty: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fairy tale
Weight: 0.65
, quality
Weight: 0.63
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hair salon
Weight: 0.68
, glory
Weight: 0.65
, grace kelly
Weight: 0.64
, waterfall
Weight: 0.59
, samantha
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
has quality system 0.84
has quality worth 0.83
be better than quantity 0.82
be better getting 0.81
is ungiven good 0.79
be improved 0.78
be more important than quantity 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(quality, be improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(quality, be improved)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(quality, be improved)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quality, be better than quantity)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waterfall, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(quality, be improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(waterfall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(waterfall, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(beauty, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(beauty, be better getting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(beauty, be better getting)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beauty, be better getting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(beauty, be better getting)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(beauty, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be improved)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(waterfall, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be improved)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(beauty, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)