beaver: be at maine

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.77
, wild animal
Weight: 0.73
, animal
Weight: 0.70
, mammal
Weight: 0.68
, fish
Weight: 0.62
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.38
, elk
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, wolf
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at maine 1.00
be at montana 0.77
be at saginaw michigan 0.77
be at michigan 0.77
be at ohio 0.76
live in alaska 0.76
be at oklahoma 0.76
be at british columbia 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, live in alaska)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(grizzly bear, live in alaska)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, live in alaska)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(beaver, be at maine)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(beaver, be at ohio)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(beaver, be at saginaw michigan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(beaver, be at michigan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(beaver, be at michigan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(beaver, be at saginaw michigan)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(beaver, be at british columbia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(beaver, be at british columbia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at ohio)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beaver, be at montana)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(beaver, be at ohio)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at montana)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(beaver, be at montana)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at ohio)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at saginaw michigan)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at michigan)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at montana)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at british columbia)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at michigan)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at saginaw michigan)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at british columbia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at maine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beaver, be at maine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at maine)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, live in alaska)