beaver: be at wooded area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.77
, wild animal
Weight: 0.73
, animal
Weight: 0.70
, mammal
Weight: 0.68
, fish
Weight: 0.62
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.38
, elk
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, wolf
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at wooded area 1.00
be at woods 0.82
be at woodland 0.82
be at meadow 0.79
be at in lake 0.76
live in lake 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fish, live in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mammal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(animal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wooded area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(animal, be at meadow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at meadow)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fish, be at in lake)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fish, live in lake)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at meadow)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at meadow)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at woodland)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fish, live in lake)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be at meadow)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(elk, be at meadow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mammal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(animal, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fish, live in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(elk, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(elk, be at meadow)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rabbit, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be at meadow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(beaver, be at wooded area)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at woods)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woods)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(beaver, be at woods)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at woodland)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(beaver, be at woodland)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woodland)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woods)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wooded area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fish, live in lake)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rodent, be at meadow)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, be at meadow)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(animal, be at meadow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(elk, be at meadow)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rabbit, be at meadow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fish, live in lake)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rodent, be at meadow)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, be at meadow)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(beaver, be at wooded area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(animal, be at meadow)