beaver: has physical part teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.77
, animal
Weight: 0.70
, mammal
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.62
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.38
, elk
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, wolf
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part teeth 1.00
have big teeth 0.90
have red teeth 0.87
has physical part tails 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(beaver, has physical part teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(beaver, has physical part tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beaver, has physical part tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(beaver, have big teeth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(beaver, have big teeth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(beaver, have big teeth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(beaver, have big teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)