bedrock: is more challenging

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.52
, subject
Weight: 0.48
, material
Weight: 0.48
, layer
Weight: 0.48
, substrate
Weight: 0.45
Siblings core
Weight: 0.31
, silica
Weight: 0.31
, raw material
Weight: 0.31
, iron ore
Weight: 0.30
, rock salt
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more challenging 1.00
is challenging 0.98
is way more challenging 0.97
is way challenging 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(bedrock, is more challenging)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(bedrock, is challenging)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(bedrock, is way more challenging)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bedrock, is challenging)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(bedrock, is way challenging)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bedrock, is way challenging)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bedrock, is way more challenging)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(bedrock, is way challenging)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(bedrock, is way more challenging)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(bedrock, is challenging)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bedrock, is challenging)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bedrock, is way more challenging)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bedrock, is way challenging)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bedrock, is more challenging)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bedrock, is more challenging)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bedrock, is more challenging)