bedroom: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bathroom
Weight: 0.68
, room
Weight: 0.67
, bath
Weight: 0.65
, hotel room
Weight: 0.64
Siblings master bedroom
Weight: 0.78
, home office
Weight: 0.68
, hallway
Weight: 0.64
, door
Weight: 0.63
, apartment
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
have bad reviews 0.77
be with bad credit 0.77
has quality prices 0.77
light bad 0.76
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(room, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(room, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bath, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(bath, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hotel room, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(bath, feel good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(bath, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(room, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(bath, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(room, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(bath, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hotel room, has quality prices)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bath, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(room, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bath, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(room, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bath, feel good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, has quality prices)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be with bad credit)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(apartment, have bad reviews)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(room, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(room, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bath, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(bath, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hotel room, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(bath, feel good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(apartment, be with bad credit)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(apartment, be with bad credit)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(apartment, have bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(apartment, have bad reviews)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(bedroom, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bedroom, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bedroom, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(bedroom, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bath, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(room, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bath, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(room, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bath, feel good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hotel room, has quality prices)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(apartment, be with bad credit)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(apartment, have bad reviews)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bath, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(room, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bath, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(room, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hotel room, has quality prices)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(bedroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bath, feel good)