beech: be used for kitchen utensils

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.72
, species
Weight: 0.67
, tree
Weight: 0.61
, hardwood
Weight: 0.57
, variety
Weight: 0.55
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.39
, birch
Weight: 0.39
, oak
Weight: 0.39
, maple tree
Weight: 0.39
, douglas fir
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used for kitchen utensils 1.00
be used for wooden spoons 0.79
be used for furniture 0.78
be used for spoons 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardwood, be used for furniture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(beech, be used for kitchen utensils)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be used for furniture)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be used for furniture)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(oak, be used for furniture)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardwood, be used for furniture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(beech, be used for kitchen utensils)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(oak, be used for furniture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oak, be used for furniture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(beech, be used for kitchen utensils)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beech, be used for wooden spoons)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(beech, be used for wooden spoons)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(beech, be used for furniture)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(beech, be used for wooden spoons)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(beech, be used for wooden spoons)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(beech, be used for spoons)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(beech, be used for spoons)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(beech, be used for furniture)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(beech, be used for furniture)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(beech, be used for furniture)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(beech, be used for spoons)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(beech, be used for spoons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beech, be used for kitchen utensils)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(beech, be used for kitchen utensils)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hardwood, be used for furniture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oak, be used for furniture)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(beech, be used for kitchen utensils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hardwood, be used for furniture)