beef: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.69
, dark meat
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.65
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, lamb
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
affect environment 0.87
be harmful to environment 0.86
be good for teanages 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
be good for us 0.78
be considered bad 0.78
go bad 0.77
has quality good 0.77
look bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dairy product, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(beef, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(meat, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(beef, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(beef, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(beef, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meat, be good for teanages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(beef, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meat, be good for teanages)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(meat, be good for teanages)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be good for us)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pork, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(meat, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(beef, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dairy product, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(beef, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(beef, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meat, be good for teanages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(beef, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(beef, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pork, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pork, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ground beef, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ground beef, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(beef, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(beef, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(meat, be good for teanages)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dairy product, be good for us)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ground beef, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lunch meat, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pork, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(meat, be good for teanages)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dairy product, be good for us)