beef: be better than chicken

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.69
, dark meat
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.65
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, lamb
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than chicken 1.00
be more expensive than chicken 0.93
be cheaper than chicken 0.93
be much greasier than chicken 0.90
be safer than chicken 0.89
be better than pork 0.88
be healthier than pork 0.85
be more expensive than pork 0.84
eat raw than pork 0.84
be cheaper than lamb 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be better than chicken)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(beef, be better than chicken)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(beef, be safer than chicken)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(beef, be safer than chicken)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(beef, be much greasier than chicken)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(beef, be safer than chicken)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(beef, be much greasier than chicken)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beef, be much greasier than chicken)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(beef, be safer than chicken)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(beef, be much greasier than chicken)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(beef, be better than pork)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beef, be healthier than pork)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beef, be better than pork)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(beef, be healthier than pork)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(beef, be better than pork)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than pork)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be better than chicken)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)