beef: be healthier than pork

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.69
, dark meat
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.65
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, lamb
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be healthier than pork 1.00
be better than pork 0.94
be more expensive than pork 0.92
eat raw than pork 0.89
be better than chicken 0.85
have meat 0.83
be safer than chicken 0.83
be more expensive than chicken 0.83
be cheaper than chicken 0.82
be cheaper than lamb 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beef, be healthier than pork)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be better than chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(beef, be healthier than pork)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(beef, be better than chicken)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(beef, have meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(beef, be safer than chicken)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(beef, be safer than chicken)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(beef, be safer than chicken)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(beef, be better than pork)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beef, have meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(beef, be safer than chicken)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be cheaper than chicken)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beef, be better than pork)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than pork)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(beef, be better than pork)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive than pork)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(beef, have meat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beef, be healthier than pork)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(beef, be healthier than pork) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)