beef: be more expensive in general

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.69
, dark meat
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.65
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, lamb
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive in general 1.00
is more expensive 0.87
is expensive 0.82
be more expensive than other meat 0.81
be more expensive than chicken 0.80
be more expensive than meat 0.79
be expensive in us 0.79
be more expensive than plant food 0.79
is more popular 0.79
be more expensive than dark meat 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than plant food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, is more expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ground beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ground beef, is more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ground beef, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ground beef, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lamb, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(beef, be more expensive in general)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(beef, is more expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(beef, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beef, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(meat, be more expensive than plant food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ground beef, is more expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lamb, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ground beef, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(meat, be more expensive than plant food)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)