beef: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.69
, dark meat
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.65
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, lamb
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
be more expensive in general 0.87
be more expensive than chicken 0.86
be more expensive than other meat 0.86
be more expensive than meat 0.86
be more expensive than plant food 0.86
is cheaper 0.86
be expensive in us 0.85
be more expensive than vegetables 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dark meat, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(dark meat, is cheaper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, is cheaper)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than plant food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, is more expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than plant food)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dark meat, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ground beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ground beef, is more expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ground beef, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ground beef, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lamb, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(beef, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive than chicken)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beef, be more expensive in general)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beef, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(beef, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(meat, be more expensive than plant food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dark meat, is cheaper)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ground beef, is more expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lamb, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ground beef, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(meat, be more expensive than plant food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dark meat, is cheaper)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)