beer: be on tap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.67
, beverage
Weight: 0.66
, drink
Weight: 0.63
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.62
Siblings guinness
Weight: 0.66
, sierra nevada
Weight: 0.59
, porter
Weight: 0.57
, bud
Weight: 0.57
, corona
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on tap 1.00
be on tap better 0.96
be better on tap 0.96
taste better on tap 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(guinness, be better on tap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(guinness, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(guinness, be better on tap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(beer, be on tap)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, be better on tap)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(beer, be better on tap)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(beer, be better on tap)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(beer, taste better on tap)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(beer, taste better on tap)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beer, be better on tap)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(beer, taste better on tap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(beer, be on tap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(beer, be on tap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(beer, be on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(guinness, be better on tap)