beer: taste better on tap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.67
, beverage
Weight: 0.66
, drink
Weight: 0.63
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.62
Siblings guinness
Weight: 0.66
, sierra nevada
Weight: 0.59
, porter
Weight: 0.57
, bud
Weight: 0.57
, corona
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste better on tap 1.00
be on tap better 0.93
be better on tap 0.93
be on tap 0.89
taste bad 0.83
taste different 0.83
taste 0.83
taste better then warm beverages 0.82
have less taste than warm drinks 0.81
taste better than cans 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(drink, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(beer, taste better on tap)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(beverage, taste better then warm beverages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(beer, taste better on tap)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(drink, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(beer, taste better on tap)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(drink, taste bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drink, taste different)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(beverage, taste better then warm beverages)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste different)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(beverage, taste better then warm beverages)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(guinness, be better on tap)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bud, taste different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(drink, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(beer, taste better on tap)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(beverage, taste better then warm beverages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(beer, taste better on tap)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(drink, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(beer, taste better on tap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(guinness, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(guinness, be better on tap)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(bud, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(bud, taste different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(beer, taste better on tap)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(beer, be better on tap)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, be better on tap)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(beer, be better on tap)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beer, be on tap)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(beer, be on tap)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(beer, be on tap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beer, be better on tap)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(beer, taste bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(beer, be on tap)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(beer, taste bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(beer, taste)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste different)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beer, taste bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(beer, taste)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(beer, taste different)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(beer, taste different)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(beer, taste different)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(beer, taste)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(beer, taste better on tap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(drink, taste bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(drink, taste different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(beverage, taste better then warm beverages)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(guinness, be better on tap)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bud, taste different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(drink, taste bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(drink, taste different)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(beer, taste better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(beverage, taste better then warm beverages)