beetle: be bad year 2017

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.72
, insect
Weight: 0.66
, organism
Weight: 0.61
, bug
Weight: 0.61
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.57
Siblings dung beetle
Weight: 0.69
, aphid
Weight: 0.38
, moth
Weight: 0.38
, spider
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad year 2018 1.00
be bad year 1.00
be bad year 2017 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(aphid, be bad year)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(aphid, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aphid, be bad year)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(beetle, be bad year 2017)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(beetle, be bad year 2018)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(beetle, be bad year)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(beetle, be bad year 2018)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(beetle, be bad year)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(beetle, be bad year 2018)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(beetle, be bad year)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(beetle, be bad year 2018)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(beetle, be bad year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beetle, be bad year 2017)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(beetle, be bad year 2017)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beetle, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(aphid, be bad year)