behavior: be related to context

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.63
, act
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.71
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68
, altruism
Weight: 0.68
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to context 1.00
be related to context of communication 0.93
be related 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(behavior, be related to context)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(activity, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(behavior, be related to context)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(activity, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(characteristic, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be related)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(activity, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(behavior, be related to context)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(activity, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(behavior, be related to context)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(behavior, be related to context)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(behavior, be related to context of communication)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(behavior, be related)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(behavior, be related)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(behavior, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(behavior, be related to context)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(activity, be related)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(activity, be related)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(behavior, be related to context) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)