behavior: be related to context of communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.63
, act
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.71
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68
, altruism
Weight: 0.68
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to context of communication 1.00
be related to context 0.93
support communication 0.80
require communication 0.78
support communication of children 0.78
be regarded as form of communication 0.77
be related 0.76
be regarded as main form of communication 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(activity, support communication of children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(activity, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(activity, support communication of children)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(activity, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(characteristic, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(activity, support communication of children)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be related)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(activity, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(activity, support communication of children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(activity, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(behavior, be related to context of communication)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(behavior, be related to context)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(behavior, be related to context)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(behavior, be related to context)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(behavior, require communication)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be regarded as form of communication)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be regarded as main form of communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(behavior, require communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(behavior, be regarded as form of communication)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(behavior, be regarded as form of communication)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(behavior, require communication)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(behavior, be regarded as form of communication)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(behavior, require communication)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(behavior, be regarded as main form of communication)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(behavior, be related)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(behavior, be regarded as main form of communication)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(behavior, be related)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(behavior, be regarded as main form of communication)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(behavior, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(activity, be related)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(activity, support communication of children)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(activity, be related)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(activity, support communication of children)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(behavior, be related to context of communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)