belly: be cold running

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.59
, area
Weight: 0.55
, symptom
Weight: 0.55
, body part
Weight: 0.55
Siblings stomach
Weight: 0.33
, nipple
Weight: 0.33
, chin
Weight: 0.33
, human body
Weight: 0.32
, nose
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cold running 1.00
is cold 0.87
is fat cold 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nose, is cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nose, is cold)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(nose, is cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(belly, be cold running)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(belly, is cold)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(belly, is cold)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(belly, is cold)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(belly, is fat cold)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(belly, is fat cold)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(belly, is fat cold)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(belly, is fat cold)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(belly, is cold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(belly, be cold running)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(belly, be cold running)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(belly, be cold running)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(nose, is cold)