benefits: be good for employees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.46
, site
Weight: 0.40
, program
Weight: 0.39
, benefit
Weight: 0.39
, solution
Weight: 0.38
Siblings savings
Weight: 0.29
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.29
, insurance
Weight: 0.29
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.29
, status
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for employees 1.00
be important to employees 0.95
be offered to employees 0.86
be offered to employees examveda 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(benefits, be good for employees)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(benefits, be offered to employees examveda)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(benefits, be offered to employees examveda)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(benefits, be important to employees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(benefits, be offered to employees)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(benefits, be offered to employees)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(benefits, be offered to employees examveda)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(benefits, be offered to employees)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(benefits, be important to employees)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(benefits, be offered to employees)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(benefits, be important to employees)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(benefits, be important to employees)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(benefits, be offered to employees examveda)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(benefits, be good for employees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(benefits, be good for employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(benefits, be good for employees)