berlin: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, artist
Weight: 0.58
, new york
Weight: 0.56
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.34
, louis armstrong
Weight: 0.33
, las vegas
Weight: 0.33
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is cheap 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(new york, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(berlin, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(new york, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(new york, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(new york, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(berlin, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(massachusetts, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(las vegas, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(new york city, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(new york city, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(berlin, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(berlin, is cheap)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(berlin, is cheap)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(berlin, is cheap)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(berlin, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(berlin, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(berlin, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(new york, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(las vegas, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new york city, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(las vegas, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(berlin, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(new york, is expensive)