:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(beryl, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(quartz, is hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(beryl, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aquamarine, is hard)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(beryl, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(beryl, is hard)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(beryl, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(beryl, is hard)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(beryl, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(quartz, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(beryl, is hard)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(aquamarine, is hard)