best man: be at friend wed

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at friend wed 1.00
be at wed 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(best man, be at friend wed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(best man, be at friend wed)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(best man, be at friend wed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(best man, be at wed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(best man, be at friend wed)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(best man, be at wed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(best man, be at friend wed)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(best man, be at wed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(best man, be at friend wed)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(best man, be at wed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(best man, be at friend wed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(best man, be at friend wed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(best man, be at friend wed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(best man, be at friend wed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(best man, be at friend wed)