best man: be at wed

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at wed 1.00
be at friend wed 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(best man, be at wed)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(best man, be at wed)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(best man, be at wed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(best man, be at friend wed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(best man, be at wed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(best man, be at friend wed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(best man, be at wed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(best man, be at friend wed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(best man, be at wed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(best man, be at friend wed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(best man, be at wed)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(best man, be at wed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(best man, be at wed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(best man, be at wed)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(best man, be at wed)