best: analyze persuasive appeals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents great
Weight: 0.60
, award
Weight: 0.60
, song
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings good book
Weight: 0.33
, good
Weight: 0.33
, good person
Weight: 0.33
, good luck
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
analyze persuasive appeals 1.00
analyze appeals 0.94
be for arguments 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(best, analyze persuasive appeals)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(best, analyze appeals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(best, analyze appeals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(best, analyze appeals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(best, be for arguments)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(best, be for arguments)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(best, analyze appeals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(best, be for arguments)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(best, be for arguments)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(best, analyze persuasive appeals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(best, analyze persuasive appeals)