best: be for arguments

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents great
Weight: 0.60
, award
Weight: 0.60
, song
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings good book
Weight: 0.33
, good
Weight: 0.33
, good person
Weight: 0.33
, good luck
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for arguments 1.00
be for productive arguments 0.90
analyze persuasive appeals 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(best, be for arguments)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(best, be for arguments)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(best, be for arguments)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(best, be for productive arguments)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(best, be for arguments)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(best, be for arguments)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(best, be for productive arguments)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(best, be for arguments)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(best, be for productive arguments)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(best, be for arguments)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(best, be for productive arguments)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(best, be for arguments)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(best, be for arguments)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(best, analyze persuasive appeals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(best, be for arguments)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(best, analyze persuasive appeals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(best, be for arguments)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(best, be for arguments)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(best, be for arguments)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(best, be for arguments)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(best, be for arguments)