beta: have bent in directions rays

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents version
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, alpha
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.53
Siblings atenolol
Weight: 0.35
, app
Weight: 0.32
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.32
, compatibility
Weight: 0.31
, mmorpg
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bent in directions rays 1.00
have bent in different directions rays 0.99
have bent 0.82
have deflected in magnetic field rays 0.77
have deflected in field rays 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(alpha, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(alpha, have bent in different directions rays)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(alpha, have bent)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(alpha, have deflected in field rays)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(alpha, have deflected in magnetic field rays)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(alpha, have bent in directions rays)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(alpha, have bent in different directions rays)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(alpha, have deflected in magnetic field rays)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(alpha, have bent)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(alpha, have deflected in field rays)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(alpha, have bent in directions rays)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(alpha, have bent in different directions rays)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(alpha, have deflected in magnetic field rays)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(alpha, have deflected in field rays)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alpha, have bent)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(alpha, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(alpha, have bent in different directions rays)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(alpha, have bent)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(alpha, have deflected in magnetic field rays)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(alpha, have deflected in field rays)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(beta, have bent in directions rays)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(beta, have bent in different directions rays)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(beta, have bent in different directions rays)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(beta, have bent in different directions rays)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(beta, have bent in different directions rays)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(beta, have deflected in field rays)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beta, have bent)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(beta, have bent)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(beta, have bent)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(beta, have deflected in magnetic field rays)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(beta, have deflected in field rays)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(beta, have deflected in field rays)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(beta, have deflected in magnetic field rays)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(beta, have deflected in magnetic field rays)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beta, have bent)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(beta, have deflected in field rays)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(beta, have deflected in magnetic field rays)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(alpha, have bent)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(alpha, have bent in different directions rays)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(alpha, have bent in directions rays)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(alpha, have deflected in magnetic field rays)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(alpha, have deflected in field rays)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(alpha, have bent in different directions rays)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(alpha, have bent in directions rays)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(alpha, have bent)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(alpha, have deflected in magnetic field rays)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(beta, have bent in directions rays)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(alpha, have deflected in field rays)