bethlehem: be known as city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.57
, city
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.54
, location
Weight: 0.53
, community
Weight: 0.50
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.29
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.29
, new york city
Weight: 0.28
, mexico city
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be known as city 1.00
be referred as city 0.89
be called city 0.86
be known as city of david 0.81
be referred as city of david 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be called city)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new york city, be called city)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(mexico city, be called city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be called city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(bethlehem, be known as city)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bethlehem, be referred as city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bethlehem, be called city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(bethlehem, be known as city of david)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(bethlehem, be referred as city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(bethlehem, be called city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bethlehem, be referred as city of david)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(bethlehem, be called city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bethlehem, be called city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(bethlehem, be known as city of david)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(bethlehem, be referred as city of david)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(bethlehem, be referred as city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(bethlehem, be known as city of david)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(bethlehem, be known as city of david)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bethlehem, be referred as city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(bethlehem, be referred as city of david)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bethlehem, be referred as city of david)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bethlehem, be known as city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bethlehem, be known as city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new york city, be called city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bethlehem, be known as city)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mexico city, be called city)