beverage: is cold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.78
, segment
Weight: 0.61
, snack
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.59
, liquor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings soda pop
Weight: 0.71
, white wine
Weight: 0.70
, hot coffee
Weight: 0.69
, vodka
Weight: 0.67
, beer
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cold 1.00
be preferred cold 0.84
is dry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(white wine, is cold)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(white wine, is dry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(white wine, is cold)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(white wine, is cold)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(white wine, is dry)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(white wine, is dry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(beverage, is cold)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(beverage, be preferred cold)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be preferred cold)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(beverage, be preferred cold)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(beverage, be preferred cold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(beverage, is cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(beverage, is cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(white wine, is dry)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(beverage, is cold)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(white wine, is cold)