bias: affect validity scientific thinking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, voltage
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, influence
Weight: 0.58
Siblings prejudice
Weight: 0.60
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, distortion
Weight: 0.33
, hostility
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect validity scientific thinking 1.00
affect validity thinking 0.95
be important in scientific method 0.81
be held in scientific experiment 0.77
affect research 0.77
be problem in scientific investigation 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(factor, be held in scientific experiment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(factor, be held in scientific experiment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(factor, be held in scientific experiment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(factor, be held in scientific experiment)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(bias, affect validity thinking)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(bias, affect validity thinking)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(bias, affect validity thinking)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bias, be important in scientific method)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(bias, affect validity thinking)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in scientific investigation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bias, affect research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(bias, be important in scientific method)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(bias, affect research)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(bias, affect research)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(bias, be important in scientific method)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(bias, affect research)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(bias, be problem in scientific investigation)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(bias, be important in scientific method)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem in scientific investigation)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in scientific investigation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(factor, be held in scientific experiment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(factor, be held in scientific experiment)