bias: be bad writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, voltage
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, influence
Weight: 0.58
Siblings prejudice
Weight: 0.60
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, distortion
Weight: 0.33
, hostility
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad writing 1.00
be bad for business 0.76
is bad thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hostility, is bad thing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(prejudice, is bad thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(prejudice, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(prejudice, is bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(hostility, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hostility, is bad thing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(bias, be bad writing)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(bias, is bad thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(bias, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(bias, is bad thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(bias, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bias, be bad writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bias, be bad writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(hostility, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(prejudice, is bad thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bias, be bad writing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)