bias: be important in scientific method

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, voltage
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, influence
Weight: 0.58
Siblings prejudice
Weight: 0.60
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, distortion
Weight: 0.33
, hostility
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in scientific method 1.00
be important in method 0.91
be held in scientific experiment 0.84
affect validity scientific thinking 0.81
be important in research 0.80
be in research 0.76
be problem in scientific investigation 0.76
be problem in experiments 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(factor, be held in scientific experiment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(bias, be important in scientific method)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(factor, be held in scientific experiment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(factor, be held in scientific experiment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(factor, be held in scientific experiment)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(bias, be important in scientific method)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(bias, be important in scientific method)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bias, be important in method)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(bias, be important in method)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bias, be in research)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bias, be important in research)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bias, be in research)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bias, be in research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(bias, be important in method)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in experiments)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in scientific investigation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bias, be important in research)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bias, be important in research)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(bias, be in research)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bias, be important in method)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(bias, be important in research)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem in experiments)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem in scientific investigation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in scientific investigation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in experiments)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(bias, be problem in experiments)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(bias, be problem in scientific investigation)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(bias, affect validity scientific thinking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bias, be important in scientific method)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(bias, be important in scientific method)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(factor, be held in scientific experiment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(bias, be important in scientific method)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(factor, be held in scientific experiment)