bias: be important in study of history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, voltage
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, influence
Weight: 0.58
Siblings prejudice
Weight: 0.60
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, distortion
Weight: 0.33
, hostility
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in study of history 1.00
be important in study 0.93
be important in history 0.90
be important in research 0.83
be problem learning about history 0.81
be in research 0.77
be bad in research 0.77
affect research 0.76
be important in life 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important in life)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(inequality, be important in life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(inequality, be important in life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(bias, be important in study of history)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bias, be important in study)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bias, be important in history)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(bias, be important in study)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(bias, be important in study)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bias, be important in research)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(bias, be important in history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(bias, be important in history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bias, be problem learning about history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bias, be in research)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(bias, affect research)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(bias, be bad in research)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bias, be important in research)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(bias, be important in research)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bias, be in research)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bias, be in research)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bias, be important in study)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(bias, affect research)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem learning about history)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(bias, be bad in research)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(bias, be bad in research)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(bias, be problem learning about history)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(bias, affect research)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bias, be important in research)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bias, be important in history)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(bias, be in research)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem learning about history)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bias, be bad in research)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bias, affect research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(bias, be important in study of history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bias, be important in study of history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(bias, be important in study of history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(inequality, be important in life)